Does more CPU cores have to be stronger? Explained here!

Now that single-core CPUs are basically extinct, the number of processor cores is basically the difference between "more" and "more".

The Celeron G5900T, which is the most entry-level desktop side in the Intel tenth-generation processor family, also has dual-core dual-threaded 3.2GHz frequency parameters.

In contrast, the flagship desktop CPUs of Intel and AMD have a very large number of cores and threads. For example, the R9 5950X has 16 cores and 32 threads, and the i9 10900K has 10 cores and 20 threads.

So, does a CPU with more cores have better performance?

We know that the performance of a CPU depends on the number of cores and the main frequency. The more the number of CPU cores, the more powerful the performance will naturally be.

More and more processor cores have become a trend now. But in this case, some players still choose to buy some CPUs with fewer cores and no hyperthreading.

This is because the processor's multi-core and high clock speed are two parameters that are difficult to have at the same time. Only the expensive flagship CPU can keep the high clock speed in the case of multi-core.

The most important reason why it is difficult to have both is heat dissipation. If the CPU has too many cores, its heat dissipation power consumption will be difficult to control. At this time, no matter how high the main frequency is, the frequency will be reduced, resulting in a decrease in performance.

Therefore, we can see that there will be two levels of differentiation on mid-range CPUs. Some CPUs have few cores or even hyperthreading functions, but the main frequency is very high.

This type of processor is more suitable for gamers. The current game's extraction of CPU performance is mainly limited to a few cores. Although multi-core optimization is a major trend, the optimization has not been completely completed, and the effect is not immediate.

The other part of the CPU has a large number of cores and will be equipped with hyper-threading technology, but its main frequency is not high, and it is generally more suitable for computing, modeling, design and other fields that can make better use of multi-core. It is also more suitable for office users who generally need to open more web pages and applications at the same time.

If you want to have both, you have to spend higher costs on the processor, and you have to put more effort into heat dissipation. Generally speaking, flagship CPUs need 360 water cooling and above radiators to suppress.

Do you understand the choice between clock speed and number of cores?